Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-08-24"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 
* We deal with the questions raised in [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues issues, see here]
 
* We deal with the questions raised in [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues issues, see here]
−
::* issue 11: consent.scope relation
+
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/11 issue 11]: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode
 +
::::* the will code will be made mandatory in the logical model as this corresponds with the most important information, it corresponds with consent provision code in FHIR
 +
::::* [https://hl7.org/FHIR/R4/valueset-consent-scope.html the category is FHIR int'l model] is mandatory and is very similar to scope
 +
::::* more investigation is necessary by eHealth platform
  
 +
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/10 issue 10]: performer vs organisation
 +
::::* the representative (mandaathouder) is in the logical model but not in the IG yet --> it is the custodian
 +
::::* where do we get the INSZ number for a notary/judge ?
 +
::::* do we need another type of representative ? trusted person?
 +
::::* can the custodian be the same person as the performer ? normally not
 +
::::* concepts need to be clarified by INAMI
 +
 +
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/9 issue 9]: update/remove links to artefacts
 +
::::* it is a temporary version of the IG, the links will be updated by eHealth platform
 +
 +
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/8 issue 8]: kmehr/FHIR mapping
 +
::::* for all existing documents in kmehr and the valuesets used there, a mapping to the FHIR valuesets is needed
 +
::::* how are we going to tackle this ?
 +
::::::* see 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 in the business rules WillCategory and WillCode
 +
::::::* we will only add values to the existing kmehr values
 +
::::::::* it seems that some kmehr values have been removed and some have not been mapped
 +
::::* the mapping will be present in the business rules document
 +
::::::* where will the mapping be made available ?
 +
 +
* royal decree stated to implement the advance cared planning by July but this is not feasible, will be for next year
 +
* There is a need to have a complete overview of how caresets will have to be exchanged in the Belgian eHealth ecosystem. This is out of scope of this WG but will need to be tackled.
 
   
 
   
  

Revision as of 08:21, 24 August 2023

Attendees

  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Hans De Keersmaeker
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Sam Jocqué

Excused

  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Filoretta Velica
  • Isabelle Pollet
  • Jens Penny
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Nick Hermans
  • Philippe Baise
  • Tom De Backer
  • Veerle Michiels
  • Walter Bollaert

Agenda

  • Review business rules document & resolve issue/questions

Minutes

  • A new version of the business rules document has been distributed to the WG members last Monday in NL and French:
  • see also in issue 12
  • we go briefly over the document
  • please have a look at the document and raise your questions or remarks by next meeting
  • The work on the implementation guide has started
  • issue 11: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode
  • the will code will be made mandatory in the logical model as this corresponds with the most important information, it corresponds with consent provision code in FHIR
  • the category is FHIR int'l model is mandatory and is very similar to scope
  • more investigation is necessary by eHealth platform
  • the representative (mandaathouder) is in the logical model but not in the IG yet --> it is the custodian
  • where do we get the INSZ number for a notary/judge ?
  • do we need another type of representative ? trusted person?
  • can the custodian be the same person as the performer ? normally not
  • concepts need to be clarified by INAMI
  • issue 9: update/remove links to artefacts
  • it is a temporary version of the IG, the links will be updated by eHealth platform
  • for all existing documents in kmehr and the valuesets used there, a mapping to the FHIR valuesets is needed
  • how are we going to tackle this ?
  • see 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 in the business rules WillCategory and WillCode
  • we will only add values to the existing kmehr values
  • it seems that some kmehr values have been removed and some have not been mapped
  • the mapping will be present in the business rules document
  • where will the mapping be made available ?
  • royal decree stated to implement the advance cared planning by July but this is not feasible, will be for next year
  • There is a need to have a complete overview of how caresets will have to be exchanged in the Belgian eHealth ecosystem. This is out of scope of this WG but will need to be tackled.


  • Next actions:
  • come prepared with remarks on the updated business rules document and first draft of logical model by 7 Sep
  • once the Royal Decree and other relevant documents (brochure) are available, they will be distributed to the WG members

Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 7 Sep at 9AM TBC

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7belgium.org/index.php?title=Minutes_-_Patient_Dossier_WG_2023-08-24&oldid=2509"