Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-09-07"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
(Created page with "=== Attendees === * Anne Nerenhausen * Alexis Van Zeveren * Félix De Tavernier * Hanne Vuegen * Hans De Keersmaeker * Jean-Michel Polfliet * Pablo Christiaens * Veerle Michie...")
 
Line 36: Line 36:
 
* We will go over the [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues issues, see here]
 
* We will go over the [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues issues, see here]
 
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/7 issue 7 Snomed codes for valuesets]:  
 
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/7 issue 7 Snomed codes for valuesets]:  
 
+
::* Anne will be checked whether the kmehr codes will be continued to be used or as from when the snomed codes will be uses
  
 
* issue 11: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode
 
* issue 11: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode
Line 62: Line 62:
 
::::::* where will the mapping be made available ?
 
::::::* where will the mapping be made available ?
  
* royal decree stated to implement the advance cared planning by July but this is not feasible, will be for next year
 
* There is a need to have a complete overview of how caresets will have to be exchanged in the Belgian eHealth ecosystem. This is out of scope of this WG but will need to be tackled.
 
 
   
 
   
  
 
* Next actions:
 
* Next actions:
::* come prepared with remarks on the updated business rules document and first draft of logical model by 7 Sep
+
::* continur resolution of issues
::* once the Royal Decree and other relevant documents (brochure) are available, they will be distributed to the WG members
 
  
 
'''Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 21 Sep at 9AM'''
 
'''Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 21 Sep at 9AM'''

Revision as of 06:57, 21 September 2023

Attendees

  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Hans De Keersmaeker
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Veerle Michiels
  • Wouter De Jonghe

Excused

  • Bart Decuypere
  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Filoretta Velica
  • Isabelle Pollet
  • Jens Penny
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Nick Hermans
  • Philippe Baise
  • Sam Jocqué
  • Tom De Backer
  • Walter Bollaert

Agenda

  • Resolve issue/questions

Minutes

  • The work on the implementation guide has started
  • issue 11: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode
  • the will code will be made mandatory in the logical model as this corresponds with the most important information, it corresponds with consent provision code in FHIR
  • the category is FHIR int'l model is mandatory and is very similar to scope
  • more investigation is necessary by eHealth platform
  • the representative (mandaathouder) is in the logical model but not in the IG yet --> it is the custodian
  • where do we get the INSZ number for a notary/judge ?
  • do we need another type of representative ? trusted person?
  • can the custodian be the same person as the performer ? normally not
  • concepts need to be clarified by INAMI
  • issue 9: update/remove links to artefacts
  • it is a temporary version of the IG, the links will be updated by eHealth platform
  • for all existing documents in kmehr and the valuesets used there, a mapping to the FHIR valuesets is needed
  • how are we going to tackle this ?
  • see 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 in the business rules WillCategory and WillCode
  • we will only add values to the existing kmehr values
  • it seems that some kmehr values have been removed and some have not been mapped
  • the mapping will be present in the business rules document
  • where will the mapping be made available ?


  • Next actions:
  • continur resolution of issues

Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 21 Sep at 9AM