Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-09-07"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
 
Line 35: Line 35:
  
 
* We will go over the [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues issues, see here]
 
* We will go over the [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues issues, see here]
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/7 issue 7 Snomed codes for valuesets]:  
+
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/7 issue 7 Snomed codes for valuesets]:  
 
::* Anne will be checked whether the kmehr codes will be continued to be used or as from when the snomed codes will be uses  
 
::* Anne will be checked whether the kmehr codes will be continued to be used or as from when the snomed codes will be uses  
  
* issue 11: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode
+
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/8 issue 8 mapping]
::::* the will code will be made mandatory in the logical model as this corresponds with the most important information, it corresponds with consent provision code in FHIR
+
::*  
::::* [https://hl7.org/FHIR/R4/valueset-consent-scope.html the category is FHIR int'l model] is mandatory and is very similar to scope
 
::::* more investigation is necessary by eHealth platform
 
  
 
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/10 issue 10]: performer vs organisation
 
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/10 issue 10]: performer vs organisation
Line 65: Line 63:
  
 
* Next actions:
 
* Next actions:
::* continur resolution of issues  
+
::* continue resolution of issues  
  
 
'''Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 21 Sep at 9AM'''
 
'''Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 21 Sep at 9AM'''

Latest revision as of 06:59, 21 September 2023

Attendees

  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Hans De Keersmaeker
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Veerle Michiels
  • Wouter De Jonghe

Excused

  • Bart Decuypere
  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Filoretta Velica
  • Isabelle Pollet
  • Jens Penny
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Nick Hermans
  • Philippe Baise
  • Sam Jocqué
  • Tom De Backer
  • Walter Bollaert

Agenda

  • Resolve issue/questions

Minutes

  • The work on the implementation guide has started
  • Anne will be checked whether the kmehr codes will be continued to be used or as from when the snomed codes will be uses
  • the representative (mandaathouder) is in the logical model but not in the IG yet --> it is the custodian
  • where do we get the INSZ number for a notary/judge ?
  • do we need another type of representative ? trusted person?
  • can the custodian be the same person as the performer ? normally not
  • concepts need to be clarified by INAMI
  • issue 9: update/remove links to artefacts
  • it is a temporary version of the IG, the links will be updated by eHealth platform
  • for all existing documents in kmehr and the valuesets used there, a mapping to the FHIR valuesets is needed
  • how are we going to tackle this ?
  • see 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 in the business rules WillCategory and WillCode
  • we will only add values to the existing kmehr values
  • it seems that some kmehr values have been removed and some have not been mapped
  • the mapping will be present in the business rules document
  • where will the mapping be made available ?


  • Next actions:
  • continue resolution of issues

Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 21 Sep at 9AM