Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-11-30"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
 
Line 33: Line 33:
 
* Work on Patient Will is almost finished
 
* Work on Patient Will is almost finished
 
* Plan is to start working on observation and problem.  
 
* Plan is to start working on observation and problem.  
::* we will start these meetings in January, most probably as from 11 JAn
+
::* we will start these meetings in January, most probably as from 11 Jan
::* we need to indentify the involved stakeholders, f.e. from Data Capabilities projects
+
::* we need to indentify the involved stakeholders, f.e. from Data Capabilities projects, HL7 Belgium will look into this
 
::* eBirth is a priority so we will start working on this, this includes condition and observation, it is mainly about malformation congenital, afterwards goal is to work on addiction
 
::* eBirth is a priority so we will start working on this, this includes condition and observation, it is mainly about malformation congenital, afterwards goal is to work on addiction
  

Latest revision as of 08:58, 30 November 2023

Attendees

  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Elisabeth Buekers
  • François Depelchin
  • Hans De Keersmaeker
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Jens Penny
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Philippe Baise
  • Veerle Michiels

Excused

  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Isabelle Pollet
  • Jens Penny
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Nick Hermans
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Sam Jocqué
  • Tom De Backer
  • Walter Bollaert
  • Wouter De Jonghe

Agenda

  • Review implementation guide and resolve issues/questions for patient will
  • Plan for upcoming meetings

Minutes

  • Work on Patient Will is almost finished
  • Plan is to start working on observation and problem.
  • we will start these meetings in January, most probably as from 11 Jan
  • we need to indentify the involved stakeholders, f.e. from Data Capabilities projects, HL7 Belgium will look into this
  • eBirth is a priority so we will start working on this, this includes condition and observation, it is mainly about malformation congenital, afterwards goal is to work on addiction
  • Patient will
  • the representative is the one who is officially mandated to represent the patient - recorder description will be updated
  • source: possibility to add a URI or pdf - binary or uri
  • changes will be made
  • do we make the identifier mandatory? no and more than one is possible
  • proposal to adopt the same system as for UHMEP
  • you provide identifier in a http header when sending for the first time, the receiving system will communicate an identifier to the sending system ; if sthg goes wrong, you can re-send the same request using the same identifier, the receiving system will send that he already processed the request. The vaults will be responsible to assign a unique identifier
  • status: is a code, not a codeable concept
  • scope: is not on the logical model, mustSupport must be removed
  • related to issue, issue can be closed
  • business rules document have to indicate that it is not used
  • scope is mandatory in the int'l profile (in R4 - in R5 is disappears), what will be the default value ; since it is not used, it does not matter what i
  • an extension will be made to the valueset, and a value "not applicable" will be added
  • category is mustSupport and mandatory: has to be changed into mandatory in logical model
  • the performer is the representative
  • recorder will be used in all caresets, we have created a BeRecorder, description will be updated
  • source: can be a reference, can be binary file
  • policyRule: is not in logical model, we will remove it as it is not mandatory in the int'l profile
  • provision refers to WillCode etc from the logical model
  • status seems to be missing as it is not the same as type, but we can use that status higher up
  • code is mandatory
  • note: we miss it here, we can add BeNote that we have created and will be there in all caresets
  • what about a general representative for the patient ? see issue 13
  • RIZIV will have to look into it
  • is it a possibility there the fallback is defined by law, not by this profile
  • is not blocking but could be an improvement
  • Next actions:
  • final review of last changes before merging

Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 11 December at 9AM