Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Population Health WG 2022-11-08"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Attendees === | === Attendees === | ||
* Bart Decuypere | * Bart Decuypere | ||
| − | * Hanne Vuegen ( | + | * Hanne Vuegen (later arrival) |
* Jean-Michel Polfliet | * Jean-Michel Polfliet | ||
* José Costa Teixeira | * José Costa Teixeira | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=== Minutes === | === Minutes === | ||
| − | * Is the rework on the logical model finished : | + | * Is the rework on the logical model finished, available here: https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/public-health/branches/issue-1/StructureDefinition-BePopulationScreening.html |
| − | + | ::* the branch is not yet merged (issue #1 branch) so some issues cannot be closed yet | |
| − | ::* issue #3: agreed to move to core package - no WG core has been set yet | + | ::* issue #3: agreed to move to core package - no WG core meeting has been set yet |
::* issue #6: the WG core has to add a logical model for BePatient | ::* issue #6: the WG core has to add a logical model for BePatient | ||
::* issue #7: are we going to model the results in the same way as done for the Lab results, see BeObservationLaboratory https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/lab/StructureDefinition-be-observation-laboratory.html, snapshot table and at https://ehealth.fgov.be/standards/fhir/core-clinical/StructureDefinition-be-observation.html, differential table | ::* issue #7: are we going to model the results in the same way as done for the Lab results, see BeObservationLaboratory https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/lab/StructureDefinition-be-observation-laboratory.html, snapshot table and at https://ehealth.fgov.be/standards/fhir/core-clinical/StructureDefinition-be-observation.html, differential table | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::::::* the only observation that will be shared is "afwijking", so only code | ::::::* the only observation that will be shared is "afwijking", so only code | ||
::::* recommendation: make it only dependent on BeObservation so the WG core has to add a logical model for BeObservation | ::::* recommendation: make it only dependent on BeObservation so the WG core has to add a logical model for BeObservation | ||
| + | ::* issue #7: currently there is a text, expectation for the patient when to expect his next appointment | ||
| + | ::::* it seems that there is currently no business need to structure this | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* There are some new issues/questions: https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues | * There are some new issues/questions: https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
* if a file is added to the repository a hapi server is setup immediately | * if a file is added to the repository a hapi server is setup immediately | ||
* What are the next steps ? | * What are the next steps ? | ||
Revision as of 09:46, 8 November 2022
Attendees
- Bart Decuypere
- Hanne Vuegen (later arrival)
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Kurt Dhaene
- Patrick Beyltjens
- Veerle Michiels
Excused
- Brecht Van Vooren
Agenda
- Rework Logical model
- Resolution of issues
Minutes
- Is the rework on the logical model finished, available here: https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/public-health/branches/issue-1/StructureDefinition-BePopulationScreening.html
- the branch is not yet merged (issue #1 branch) so some issues cannot be closed yet
- issue #3: agreed to move to core package - no WG core meeting has been set yet
- issue #6: the WG core has to add a logical model for BePatient
- issue #7: are we going to model the results in the same way as done for the Lab results, see BeObservationLaboratory https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/lab/StructureDefinition-be-observation-laboratory.html, snapshot table and at https://ehealth.fgov.be/standards/fhir/core-clinical/StructureDefinition-be-observation.html, differential table
- mandatory fields: code
- mustSupport fields: language, identifier, status, category, code, (most probably not needed: hasMember, derivedFrom)
- are there LOINC codes for the tests that are being done ?
- the only observation that will be shared is "afwijking", so only code
- recommendation: make it only dependent on BeObservation so the WG core has to add a logical model for BeObservation
- issue #7: currently there is a text, expectation for the patient when to expect his next appointment
- it seems that there is currently no business need to structure this
- There are some new issues/questions: https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues
- if a file is added to the repository a hapi server is setup immediately
- What are the next steps ?
- check if all resources are present
- can we add the actors and transactions be added to the guidance ?
- possibility to add identifiers f.e. when sending this info to another party like Vitalink - check if references are sufficient
Action Items
- resolution of open issues
Date next meeting
- Tuesday Nov 22 at 10AM
