Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Population Health WG 2022-12-20"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::::* there are some issues with the terminologies, NRC has to determine the codes | ::::* there are some issues with the terminologies, NRC has to determine the codes | ||
::::* there is a dependency on the dev profile | ::::* there is a dependency on the dev profile | ||
− | ::* [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XdpeVp132SfVLyyY7SU4PXO3ApPivL6n/view?usp=share_link question on screening, what do we use] ? We will have to check with a doctor/CVKO director | + | ::* [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XdpeVp132SfVLyyY7SU4PXO3ApPivL6n/view?usp=share_link question on screening, what do we use] ? We will have to check with a doctor/CVKO director : this will be moved to another issue |
+ | ::* this issue can be closed | ||
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/10 Issue #10]: actors & transactions | * [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/10 Issue #10]: actors & transactions |
Revision as of 09:18, 20 December 2022
Attendees
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Hanne Vuegen
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Kurt Dhaene
- Patrick Beyltjens
- Veerle Michiels
Excused
- Bart Decuypere
Agenda
- Resolution of issues
Minutes
- there are plenty of warnings but not worrisome, some technical ones
- José did some technical fixes: removing period & space at the end
- BeLocation was blocking the build, we only have Location
- there are some issues with the terminologies, NRC has to determine the codes
- there is a dependency on the dev profile
- question on screening, what do we use ? We will have to check with a doctor/CVKO director : this will be moved to another issue
- this issue can be closed
- Issue #10: actors & transactions
- Kurt has done some work and has put all the information in the issue itself
- Issue #9: BeObservation
- a codeable concept should be used, then LOINC should be used (LOINC was used for labresults, snomed CT for other than labresults)
- if LOINC will be used, no changes are needed to
- any update from NRC and LOINC responsable persons whether it shoould be LOINC or Snomed CT codes - ( Bart would contact NRC)
- TBC Issue #8: nextInvitation
- appointment doesn't seem to fit
- has change in logical model been made ?
- when can we expect a publication ?
- actors & transactors have to be added to the guidance : when can this be done ?
- if no more remarks, publication can be prepared
Action Items
- resolution of remaining open issues
Date next meeting
- Tuesday 20 Dec at 10AM