Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Population Health WG 2022-12-20"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Line 23: Line 23:
 
::::* there are some issues with the terminologies, NRC has to determine the codes  
 
::::* there are some issues with the terminologies, NRC has to determine the codes  
 
::::* there is a dependency on the dev profile  
 
::::* there is a dependency on the dev profile  
 +
 
::* [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XdpeVp132SfVLyyY7SU4PXO3ApPivL6n/view?usp=share_link question on screening, what do we use] ? We will have to check with a doctor/CVKO director : this will be moved to another issue
 
::* [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XdpeVp132SfVLyyY7SU4PXO3ApPivL6n/view?usp=share_link question on screening, what do we use] ? We will have to check with a doctor/CVKO director : this will be moved to another issue
 
::* this issue can be closed
 
::* this issue can be closed
 +
 +
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/11 Issue #11]: review references to other resources
 +
::* references to BE profiles have to be added where relevant at this time
 +
  
 
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/10 Issue #10]: actors & transactions
 
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/10 Issue #10]: actors & transactions

Revision as of 09:20, 20 December 2022

Attendees

  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Kurt Dhaene
  • Patrick Beyltjens
  • Veerle Michiels

Excused

  • Bart Decuypere

Agenda

  • Resolution of issues

Minutes

  • there are plenty of warnings but not worrisome, some technical ones
  • José did some technical fixes: removing period & space at the end
  • BeLocation was blocking the build, we only have Location
  • there are some issues with the terminologies, NRC has to determine the codes
  • there is a dependency on the dev profile
  • Issue #11: review references to other resources
  • references to BE profiles have to be added where relevant at this time


  • Kurt has done some work and has put all the information in the issue itself
  • a codeable concept should be used, then LOINC should be used (LOINC was used for labresults, snomed CT for other than labresults)
  • if LOINC will be used, no changes are needed to
  • any update from NRC and LOINC responsable persons whether it shoould be LOINC or Snomed CT codes - ( Bart would contact NRC)
  • appointment doesn't seem to fit
  • has change in logical model been made ?
  • when can we expect a publication ?
  • actors & transactors have to be added to the guidance : when can this be done ?
  • if no more remarks, publication can be prepared

Action Items

  • resolution of remaining open issues

Date next meeting

  • Tuesday 20 Dec at 10AM