Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2020-01-11"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
===== Attendees =====  
 
===== Attendees =====  
 
* Robin Bosman
 
* Robin Bosman
* Frederik De Kegel
+
* Dr Alain Derom  
* Paul Neyens
+
* Andries Demont
* Dr Alain Derom
 
* Karlien Erauw
 
* Thibault Mahieu
 
* Joost Van Averbeke
 
* Hans De Keersmaecker
 
 
* Benny Verhamme
 
* Benny Verhamme
* Theo Schumacher
 
* Peter Laridon
 
* Frederik Lenaerts
 
* José Costa Teixeira - niet
 
* Mieke Buckinx
 
 
* Frank Vandewiele
 
* Frank Vandewiele
 +
* Frederik Lenaerts
 +
* Hans De Keersmaecker
 +
* Joost Van Averbeke
 +
* Kristof Jaubin
 +
* Mieke Buckinx
 +
* Paul Neyens
 +
* Peter Laridon
 +
* Karlien Erauw
 +
* Theo Schumacher
 +
* Thibault Mahieu
 +
* Tom Fiers
  
 
===== Excused =====  
 
===== Excused =====  
Line 33: Line 34:
 
::* if you have several specimens,  you need several labo orders (one order per specimen)
 
::* if you have several specimens,  you need several labo orders (one order per specimen)
 
::* for micro biology, you give the specimen (aeroob & anaeroob)
 
::* for micro biology, you give the specimen (aeroob & anaeroob)
::* in an  
+
::* with requisition id you can link several labo orders
 
+
* a RETAM code can only appear once in an order, otherwise labo cannot deal with
 +
::* if this RETAM code is not sufficient, the specimen info has to added
 +
::* if 2 RETAM codes are needed, 2 labo orders will be needed
 +
::* sending system has to determine this
 +
* there is a link with the invoicing
  
 +
* Priority codes as part of the service request (routine, urgent, asap, stat= emergency)
 +
::* 4 codes are available in FHIR: routine, urgent, asap, stat (= emergency)
 +
::* are these codes sufficient when mentioning the definitions or are more , see [http://hl7.org/fhir/valueset-request-priority.html here]
 +
::* we can define our own list or an existing other [https://www.hl7.org/fhir/v3/ActPriority/cs.html HL7 list]
 +
::* preference goes to list with 4 options
 +
* callback result/requested result notification: is this useful ?
 +
::* could a boolean be sufficient ? yes/no ?
 +
::* options for callback: phone call, text message, notification by eHealthbox
 +
::* how do other countries handle this?
 +
::* check with other county and setup Q&A session
  
* '''Next Meeting:''' Monday January 25 at 4PM
+
'''Next Meeting:''' Monday January 25 at 4PM

Latest revision as of 12:22, 12 April 2021

Attendees
  • Robin Bosman
  • Dr Alain Derom
  • Andries Demont
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Frank Vandewiele
  • Frederik Lenaerts
  • Hans De Keersmaecker
  • Joost Van Averbeke
  • Kristof Jaubin
  • Mieke Buckinx
  • Paul Neyens
  • Peter Laridon
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Theo Schumacher
  • Thibault Mahieu
  • Tom Fiers
Excused
  • Dieter De Gruyter
Agenda
  • work items: priorities
  • labo codes
Minutes
  • Set priorities of work items
  • Lab prescription: transfer of codes in the labo ordering
  • 2 fields are foreseen in the FHIR profile: code and detail code (multiple ones are possible)
  • detail code : similar to result
  • What about the specimen ?
  • you cannot link code to specimen
  • there is a workaround: requisition code (which is an identifier)
  • if you have several specimens, you need several labo orders (one order per specimen)
  • for micro biology, you give the specimen (aeroob & anaeroob)
  • with requisition id you can link several labo orders
  • a RETAM code can only appear once in an order, otherwise labo cannot deal with
  • if this RETAM code is not sufficient, the specimen info has to added
  • if 2 RETAM codes are needed, 2 labo orders will be needed
  • sending system has to determine this
  • there is a link with the invoicing
  • Priority codes as part of the service request (routine, urgent, asap, stat= emergency)
  • 4 codes are available in FHIR: routine, urgent, asap, stat (= emergency)
  • are these codes sufficient when mentioning the definitions or are more , see here
  • we can define our own list or an existing other HL7 list
  • preference goes to list with 4 options
  • callback result/requested result notification: is this useful ?
  • could a boolean be sufficient ? yes/no ?
  • options for callback: phone call, text message, notification by eHealthbox
  • how do other countries handle this?
  • check with other county and setup Q&A session

Next Meeting: Monday January 25 at 4PM