Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2020-09-17"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* Arnaud Lippert
 
* Arnaud Lippert
 
* Anne Nerenhausen
 
* Anne Nerenhausen
* Jose Costa Teixeira
+
* Karlien Erauw
* Karlien ERauw
 
 
* Nick Hermans
 
* Nick Hermans
 +
* Kristof Jaubin
  
 
===== Excused =====
 
===== Excused =====
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
===== Agenda =====
 
===== Agenda =====
* Updates on existing artefacts
+
* Updates on minor changes on existing artefacts http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/artifacts.html
** Codesystem names
+
** Codesystem names : – naming has to be in singular, not in plural
 +
** optional requirement: possibility to link several request together – through FHIR requisition element
 +
 
 
* Focus on laboratory
 
* Focus on laboratory
** Where to do the work
+
** Data analysis is ongoing at RIZIV, the logical datamodel is expected to be finished in 1/2 weeks
** Order profile created
+
** Do we cover the labo ordering in this WG or in the new working group HL7 BE FHIR Labo (focus on structured labo results) ? Fundamentals for orders will be discussed in this WG and then it will be handed over to the Labo WG
 +
** Labo order profile has been created: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-lab-prescription.html
 +
::* all elements have now been marked as must support
 +
::* preference on codes for the observations are explained in http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-lab-prescription-definitions.html#ServiceRequest.code
 +
::::* Loinc > Albert > laboratory owned code + mandatory text > only text
 +
::* specimen: no BE profiling yet, not sure if it is necessary – not in scope of this WG
 +
::* there are many different ways to do a labo order and labos thinks it works well – request on paper/ labo have requests on website / labo have modules o include in GP package
 +
::* Loinc has its own terminology servers, there seem not to any plans for terminology servers in BE
 +
::* Looking into : http://vas.ehealth.fgov.be/webretam/retam/home.htm?eventName=SEARCH_BY_ALBERT_CODE
 +
 
 +
'''Next meeting: Oct 1, 4PM'''

Latest revision as of 16:05, 18 September 2020

Attendees
  • Robin Bosman
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Bruno Casneuf
  • Arnaud Lippert
  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Nick Hermans
  • Kristof Jaubin
Excused
  • Philip Sidgwick
  • Tim Weltens
Agenda
  • Loinc > Albert > laboratory owned code + mandatory text > only text
  • specimen: no BE profiling yet, not sure if it is necessary – not in scope of this WG
  • there are many different ways to do a labo order and labos thinks it works well – request on paper/ labo have requests on website / labo have modules o include in GP package
  • Loinc has its own terminology servers, there seem not to any plans for terminology servers in BE
  • Looking into : http://vas.ehealth.fgov.be/webretam/retam/home.htm?eventName=SEARCH_BY_ALBERT_CODE

Next meeting: Oct 1, 4PM