Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2020-09-17"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Line 7: Line 7:
 
* Karlien Erauw
 
* Karlien Erauw
 
* Nick Hermans
 
* Nick Hermans
 +
* Kristof Jaubin
  
 
===== Excused =====
 
===== Excused =====
Line 15: Line 16:
 
* Updates on minor changes on existing artefacts http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/artifacts.html
 
* Updates on minor changes on existing artefacts http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/artifacts.html
 
** Codesystem names : – naming has to be in singular, not in plural
 
** Codesystem names : – naming has to be in singular, not in plural
−
** optional requirement possibility to link several request together – through FHIR requisition element
+
** optional requirement: possibility to link several request together – through FHIR requisition element
  
 
* Focus on laboratory
 
* Focus on laboratory
−
**
+
** Data analysis is ongoing at RIZIV, the logical datamodel is expected to be finished in 1/2 weeks
−
** Where to do the work
+
** Do we cover the labo ordering in this WG or in the new working group HL7 BE FHIR Labo (focus on structured labo results) ?
−
** Order profile created
+
::*Fundamentals for orders will be discussed in this WG and then it will be handed over to the Labo WG
 +
** Labo order profile has been created: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-lab-prescription.html
 +
::* all elements have now been marked as must support
 +
::* preference on codes for the observations are explained in http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-lab-prescription-definitions.html#ServiceRequest.code
 +
::::* Loinc > Albert > laboratory owned code + mandatory text > only text
 +
::* specimen: no BE profiling yet, not sure if it is necessary – not in scope of this WG
 +
::* there are many different ways to do a labo order and labos thinks it works well – request on paper/ labo have requests on website / labo have modules o include in GP package
 +
::* Loinc has its own terminology servers, there seem not to any plans for terminology servers in BE
 +
::* Looking into : http://vas.ehealth.fgov.be/webretam/retam/home.htm?eventName=SEARCH_BY_ALBERT_CODE

Revision as of 16:02, 18 September 2020

Attendees
  • Robin Bosman
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Bruno Casneuf
  • Arnaud Lippert
  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Nick Hermans
  • Kristof Jaubin
Excused
  • Philip Sidgwick
  • Tim Weltens
Agenda
  • Focus on laboratory
    • Data analysis is ongoing at RIZIV, the logical datamodel is expected to be finished in 1/2 weeks
    • Do we cover the labo ordering in this WG or in the new working group HL7 BE FHIR Labo (focus on structured labo results) ?
  • Fundamentals for orders will be discussed in this WG and then it will be handed over to the Labo WG
  • Loinc > Albert > laboratory owned code + mandatory text > only text
  • specimen: no BE profiling yet, not sure if it is necessary – not in scope of this WG
  • there are many different ways to do a labo order and labos thinks it works well – request on paper/ labo have requests on website / labo have modules o include in GP package
  • Loinc has its own terminology servers, there seem not to any plans for terminology servers in BE
  • Looking into : http://vas.ehealth.fgov.be/webretam/retam/home.htm?eventName=SEARCH_BY_ALBERT_CODE
Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7belgium.org/index.php?title=Minutes_-_Referral_WG_2020-09-17&oldid=553"