Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2020-11-14"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Attendees ===== | ===== Attendees ===== | ||
| − | * Robin Bosman | + | * Robin Bosman |
| − | * Frederik De Kegel | + | * Frederik De Kegel |
| − | * Paul Neyens | + | * Paul Neyens |
| − | * Dr Alain Derom | + | * Dr Alain Derom |
| − | * Karlien Erauw | + | * Karlien Erauw |
| − | * Thibault Mahieu | + | * Thibault Mahieu |
| − | * Dieter De Gruyter | + | * Dieter De Gruyter |
| − | * Joost Van Averbeke (MIPS) | + | * Joost Van Averbeke (MIPS) |
| − | * Hans De Keersmaecker | + | * Hans De Keersmaecker |
| − | * Benny Verhamme | + | * Benny Verhamme |
| − | * Theo Schumacher | + | * Theo Schumacher |
| − | * Peter Laridon | + | * Peter Laridon |
| − | * Frederik Lenaerts | + | * Frederik Lenaerts |
| − | * José Costa Teixeira | + | * José Costa Teixeira |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===== Excused ===== | ===== Excused ===== | ||
| − | |||
* Mieke Buckinx | * Mieke Buckinx | ||
| Line 58: | Line 49: | ||
::* important to keep link with specimen | ::* important to keep link with specimen | ||
** you can have multiple codes per requester - to be doublechecked | ** you can have multiple codes per requester - to be doublechecked | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* '''Next Meeting:''' Monday January 4 at 4PM | * '''Next Meeting:''' Monday January 4 at 4PM | ||
| − | * '''Action points for all:''' please have a closer look at the labo order (through thinking of reallife examples) and provide us with your feedback by email or through this [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdrWQl4Uhu7SbtCrEYdXI1cOEmPpKyKSVl7apgNIDIRm-kZ1g/viewform?entry.1353807103=HL7.COUNTRY.FHIR.IG%5CGuidance%20-%20FHIR%20v4.0.1&entry.247644557=The%20laboratory%20order feedback form] | + | * '''Action points for all:''' please have a closer look at the labo order (through thinking of reallife examples) and provide us with your feedback [http://mailto:karlien.erauw@agoria.be by email] or through this [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdrWQl4Uhu7SbtCrEYdXI1cOEmPpKyKSVl7apgNIDIRm-kZ1g/viewform?entry.1353807103=HL7.COUNTRY.FHIR.IG%5CGuidance%20-%20FHIR%20v4.0.1&entry.247644557=The%20laboratory%20order feedback form] |
Revision as of 16:41, 14 December 2020
Contents
Attendees
- Robin Bosman
- Frederik De Kegel
- Paul Neyens
- Dr Alain Derom
- Karlien Erauw
- Thibault Mahieu
- Dieter De Gruyter
- Joost Van Averbeke (MIPS)
- Hans De Keersmaecker
- Benny Verhamme
- Theo Schumacher
- Peter Laridon
- Frederik Lenaerts
- José Costa Teixeira
Excused
- Mieke Buckinx
Agenda
- incoming issues
- labo ordering
Minutes
- Discussion of the issues raised since the previous meeting: no issues were raised since last meeting
- Welcome and quick wrap-up to newcomer Joost from MIPS
- Changes in the implementation guide can be followed up here
- Narrative: is this mandatory ? see guidance, FHIR's philosophy is to have one
- Labo ordering, link is included in the guidance, see also here: presentation of the different resources
- based on the ServiceRequest, used for non-medication issues
- see example
- use of contained resources <> labo report uses bundle : we will evolve in Belgium to a "server" that will handle all referral prescriptions, UHMEP identifier is the reference ID in this system that RIZIV is working on
- other FHIR instances are included in the ServiceRequest using the FHIR contained mechanism (using hashtags #)
- not decided if contained mechanism will be mandatory or if bundles will be used
- requisition: if multiple orders/prescriptions exist using the same identifier
- intent
- category will be LaboratoryTest
- priority is optional
- in CDA something was foreseen so this has to be included
- f.e. result has to be communicated by phone (does not include urgent)
- subject = the patient
- encounter: is optional, can be removed
- occurence: can this be practical for "kweek" ? or for diabetic day curves
- insurance: can have multiple occurences (0..x)
- if labo order is needed as a pre-condition for a life insurance, the insurance company will pay and not RIZIV, how will this be handled in the order
- bodySite: is this relevant for a labo order ? as this is already included in the specimen - better to remove it as it can cause confusion
- patientInstruction: when patient has to be sober or medication cannot be taken 3 days prior
- important to keep link with specimen
- you can have multiple codes per requester - to be doublechecked
- Next Meeting: Monday January 4 at 4PM
- Action points for all: please have a closer look at the labo order (through thinking of reallife examples) and provide us with your feedback by email or through this feedback form
