Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2021-11-16"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
===== Attendees =====  
 
===== Attendees =====  
* Dr Alain Derom
+
* Alexis Van Zeveren (arrived late)
* Bart Decuypere
+
* Dr Alain Derom  
* Benny Verhamme
+
* Bart Decuypere  
 +
* Benny Verhamme  
 +
* Frédéric Istace
 
* Frederik Lenaerts  
 
* Frederik Lenaerts  
 
* Hans De Keersmaecker  
 
* Hans De Keersmaecker  
Line 12: Line 14:
 
* Kristof Jaubin   
 
* Kristof Jaubin   
 
* Nick Hermans  
 
* Nick Hermans  
* Olivier Lothaire
+
* Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
* Richard Francken
+
* Peter Laridon
* Theo Schumacher
+
* Robert Nicolas (Medispring)
* Tom Fiers
+
* Thibault Mahieu
 +
* Tom Tollenaere
 
* Stefan Waegemans  
 
* Stefan Waegemans  
* Toon Schiemsky
+
* Toon Schiemsky  
  
 
===== Excused/Not present =====  
 
===== Excused/Not present =====  
 
* Frederik De Kegel
 
* Frederik De Kegel
 
* Mieke Buckinx
 
* Mieke Buckinx
 +
* Olivier Lothaire
 
* Paul Neyens
 
* Paul Neyens
* Peter Laridon
+
* Richard Francken
* Tom Tollenaere
+
* Theo Schumacher
 +
* Tom Fiers
  
 
===== Agenda =====
 
===== Agenda =====
* Final updates & feedback
+
* Rework on issues resulted from the pilot phase
  
 
===== Minutes =====
 
===== Minutes =====
* Updates of the pilot phase of the Lab result project
+
* Updates of the pilot phase of the Lab result project, [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_kdAsluoOGHxq_eOSbx-hC5P8mBI1gsO/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105469359652835948544&rtpof=true&sd=true see presentation here] - by Jean-Michel Polfliet
 
::* goal of the pilot: implementation proof documentation for the project  
 
::* goal of the pilot: implementation proof documentation for the project  
::* 5 participants (2 GP softs + EPD soft + 2 LIS) + 2 biologists
+
::* 5 pilot participants (2 GP softs + EPD soft + 2 LIS) + 2 biologists
::* tracking of issues in github
+
::* tracking of issues is done in github
 
::* testcases will be used in the future for the end-to-end solution
 
::* testcases will be used in the future for the end-to-end solution
 
   
 
   
: Today we will deal with the issues having status "To Be Validated by WG"
+
* '''List of issues is here:''' https://github.com/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/projects/1
 +
* Today we will deal with the issues having as status "To Be Validated by WG"
 +
* Issue #18 Every bundle needs a unique identifier - how will be deal with this at national level, do we want to standardise this ? yes
 +
::* combination of system and value has to be unique
 +
::* Medina will remove the lab prefix : lab riziv number + unique number for the lab (f.e. riziv request number)
 +
::* HL7 Belgium has to work on naming system : HL7 Belgium will set this up in the way "this is the approved url as agreed" - it will be the identifier of the bundle, not the unique ID
 +
::* please note: one request cannot have 2 bundles as outcome
 +
 
 +
* The Bundles have to be unique, any reference identifiers in the bundle do not have to be unique ? They only have to be unique within the same bundle
 +
 
 +
* Issue #26 "Multilevel titles on protocols"
 +
::* a lab protocol has titles and none or multiple subtitles and each level can have results
 +
::* need for agreement on way of encoding
 +
::::* proposal: using "hasMember" as this has been created to have hierarchy
 +
* Issue #38 is almost the same issue "Subtitles and panels"
 +
::* nuance of narrative generation
 +
::* is there a need for a dummy narrative to a panel ?
 +
::* Conclusion: if you have a child you have to use "hasMember"
 +
 
 +
* Narrative: the receiving party needs to be able to rebuild the protocol
 +
::* Macsys wants to leave the narrative empty - is this against the HL7 FHIR standard mandatory guidance ? Macsys will create plain text in the narrative
 +
::* copy of the protocol could be sent as a blob, not in the narrative
 +
 
 +
* Issue 34 about coding system to include in the observation
 +
::* can we use multiple ones ?
 +
::* link to coding system : FHIR allows Loinc, Albert or lab codes
 +
::* should we not determine how we have to identify lab coding systems - will Medidoc, Medigest codes be identified ?
 +
::* is there a repository page of the used lab coding systems ? needs to be created & option to be re-validated by this WG
 +
::* a terminology server could be an option for the future
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Action items'''
 +
* HL7 Belgium to make up naming system for identifier for bundles
 +
* HL7 Belgium to make up repository page of the used lab coding systems
 +
* HL7 Belgium to update status of discussed items
  
'''Next Meeting:''' Dec 30 at 4PM
+
'''Next Meeting:''' additional meeting on Thursday Nov 25 at 1PM to make progress

Latest revision as of 16:31, 16 November 2021

Attendees
  • Alexis Van Zeveren (arrived late)
  • Dr Alain Derom
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Frédéric Istace
  • Frederik Lenaerts
  • Hans De Keersmaecker
  • Jean-Michel Polfiet
  • Joost Van Averbeke
  • Jos Bellen
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Kristof Jaubin
  • Nick Hermans
  • Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
  • Peter Laridon
  • Robert Nicolas (Medispring)
  • Thibault Mahieu
  • Tom Tollenaere
  • Stefan Waegemans
  • Toon Schiemsky
Excused/Not present
  • Frederik De Kegel
  • Mieke Buckinx
  • Olivier Lothaire
  • Paul Neyens
  • Richard Francken
  • Theo Schumacher
  • Tom Fiers
Agenda
  • Rework on issues resulted from the pilot phase
Minutes
  • goal of the pilot: implementation proof documentation for the project
  • 5 pilot participants (2 GP softs + EPD soft + 2 LIS) + 2 biologists
  • tracking of issues is done in github
  • testcases will be used in the future for the end-to-end solution
  • combination of system and value has to be unique
  • Medina will remove the lab prefix : lab riziv number + unique number for the lab (f.e. riziv request number)
  • HL7 Belgium has to work on naming system : HL7 Belgium will set this up in the way "this is the approved url as agreed" - it will be the identifier of the bundle, not the unique ID
  • please note: one request cannot have 2 bundles as outcome
  • The Bundles have to be unique, any reference identifiers in the bundle do not have to be unique ? They only have to be unique within the same bundle
  • Issue #26 "Multilevel titles on protocols"
  • a lab protocol has titles and none or multiple subtitles and each level can have results
  • need for agreement on way of encoding
  • proposal: using "hasMember" as this has been created to have hierarchy
  • Issue #38 is almost the same issue "Subtitles and panels"
  • nuance of narrative generation
  • is there a need for a dummy narrative to a panel ?
  • Conclusion: if you have a child you have to use "hasMember"
  • Narrative: the receiving party needs to be able to rebuild the protocol
  • Macsys wants to leave the narrative empty - is this against the HL7 FHIR standard mandatory guidance ? Macsys will create plain text in the narrative
  • copy of the protocol could be sent as a blob, not in the narrative
  • Issue 34 about coding system to include in the observation
  • can we use multiple ones ?
  • link to coding system : FHIR allows Loinc, Albert or lab codes
  • should we not determine how we have to identify lab coding systems - will Medidoc, Medigest codes be identified ?
  • is there a repository page of the used lab coding systems ? needs to be created & option to be re-validated by this WG
  • a terminology server could be an option for the future


Action items

  • HL7 Belgium to make up naming system for identifier for bundles
  • HL7 Belgium to make up repository page of the used lab coding systems
  • HL7 Belgium to update status of discussed items

Next Meeting: additional meeting on Thursday Nov 25 at 1PM to make progress