Minutes - Referral WG 2022-03-22

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 15:09, 22 March 2022 by KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==== Attendees ==== * Dr Alain Derom * Bart Decuypere * Filip Migom * Hans De Keersmaecker * Jean-Michel Polfiet * Jos Bellen * José Costa Teixeira (arrived late) * Karlien...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Attendees

  • Dr Alain Derom
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Filip Migom
  • Hans De Keersmaecker
  • Jean-Michel Polfiet
  • Jos Bellen
  • José Costa Teixeira (arrived late)
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Kristof Jaubin
  • Lotte Adriaensen
  • Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
  • Olivier Lothaire
  • Peter Laridon
  • Philippe Cauchie
  • Stefan Waegemans
  • Sven Bisaro
  • Theo Schumacher
  • Thibault Mahieu
  • Tom Tollenaere

Excused/Not present

  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Bart Havermans
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Frédéric Istace
  • Frederik De Kegel
  • Frederik Lenaerts
  • Hendrik De Moor
  • Joost Van Averbeke
  • Mieke Buckinx
  • Nick Hermans
  • Paul Neyens
  • Richard Francken
  • Robert Nicolas
  • Roland Vueghs
  • Tom Fiers
  • Toon Schiemsky
  • Veerle Claessens
  • Werner De Mulder
  • Yulia Shornikova

Agenda

  • Discuss and resolve open issues

Minutes

Resolution of open issues: https://github.com/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/projects/1

  • Issue 98 - accreditation comment
  • what is really required for the Belac accreditation ?
  • do we need a general accr comment for the entire report
  • if we keep the comment on the result level
  • Belac requires your accr nbr
  • Belac requires info at test level
  • Belac requires to put more info in the "footer" ; behind every test you can put more details
  • experiences abroad: see question in FHIR chat - CLIA in the US, see here

TBC

  • Issue 105 - microbiology reporting :
  • put observation under report results, so you can put antibiotic results that are also put as an observation
  • add an intermediate level and to be tested (MIPS at UZ Gent & CHU Charleroi)
  • Questions that are open since a while - see issue 105
  • Q1:
  • Q2: what do other countries do about microbiology
  • Q3: is snomed CT code mandatory for germs code
  • Q4: integration of RIS or IRS : would be an integration of an additional system...
  • all narrative answers must be supported, must be accepted - digital report should have the same content as paper reports
  • there is a codesystem for the antibiotic values
  • interpretation is a codeable concept but there is also a value - put in the value
  • Issue 108 - ACTH system URL
  • will we use ACTH code or lab code : does not matter
  • there will not be a table having all ACTH codes unless the identifier is the same
  • ACTH codes can be used according to the rules described i.e. LOINC, Albert
  • Issue 103: issue is not clear enough - need for clarification from Tom Fiers
  • Issue 102 : can be closed as has been added to the guidance
  • Issue 99: extensions that might be necessary at report level
  • digital lab report has to
  • extension will be called "note" and that no type will be enforced/no standardized type


Agenda for next meeting:

  • come to a consensus on the open issues - please have a look at the proposed solution for the issues in status "To be validated by WG"

Next Meeting - next week as there are some open issues: on Tuesday March 22 or 29 - TBC at 4PM