Minutes - Referral WG 2023-06-02

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 07:59, 2 June 2023 by KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (→‎Agenda)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Attendees

  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Bart Reekmans
  • Cyprien Janssens
  • Emily Sevrin
  • Hans De Keersmaecker
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Julien Beard
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Lionel Cremer
  • Maarten Cobbaert
  • Philippe Baise
  • Philippe Lejoly
  • Robin Merckx

Excused

  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Anthony Maton
  • Ben Goosse
  • Christophe Behaegel
  • Dorsan de Fabricheckers
  • Geert Vandenhole
  • Jacques Yakoub
  • Jean-Francois Coquelet
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Katleen Smedts
  • Katrien Dickx
  • Katrien Thorré
  • Marleen Van Eygen
  • Maxime Daive
  • Nathan Peeters
  • Laurent Lamouline
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Pieter Devolder
  • Richard Francken

Agenda

  • continue resolution of issues (214, 250 and new issues)

Meeting Minutes

  • review has been finalised and WG agrees with this solution so issue can be closed
  • practioner role is in a contained resource and cannot be searched
  • several stakeholders prefer option 1 instead of an extension
  • Julien thinks that performerType is the correct place but the cardinality at int'l level is 0 to 1 and we need O to * not correct so we would need an extension and this is not narrowing down
  • could it work with a practioner role ? we need multiple performer types as sometimes the request can be performed by different types of performers to fulfill one service request (f.e. diabetes education by nurse & physiotherapist)
  • option is to force the prescriber to choose the type of the performer
  • the prescribers (HCP) need to be consulted to proceed in this way
  • to check if this needs a change in the logical model
  • a performer task must be linked to a prescription via basedOn
  • field basedOn is not mustSupport, needs indeed to be changed to mustSupport
  • needs indeed to be changed to mustSupport
  • INAMI reasoning: there is no way/a lack in Belgium to identify a HCP so the proposed way is the only way to identify the HCP that is meaningful
  • does a HCP that performs a referral not always have a INAMI number? it indeed exists that a nurse does not have an INAMI number, f.e. a nurse that works in a hospital; an example needs to be provided
  • When consulting prescriptions, it is important to be able to search by nihii number and not just by niss. This is important for both the performer and the requester
  • the INAMI number is not saved, you can consult it through Cobhra it it is there
  • a HCP can perform care tasks using the INAMI number of a hospitaln (often foreigners)
  • a visa is the right to practice
  • students receive a temporary INAMI number, after their specialisation it can change
  • the "contained resource" concept will not used in the UHMEP project
  • it is stated that searches in contained resources are feasible
  • in a contained resource you can put your own reference
  • issue 242 is still open outside of the June release but important


  • looking into "1.9 Education and self-care for diabetes patients without a care path", see example here


Agenda next meeting

  • continue resolution of issues and presentation of use cases

Next meeting: next week Friday 16 June at 9AM