View source for Minutes - FHIR Validation Group 2022-05-12

Thursday, 12th May 2022, 10:00 CET

= Agenda =
* Reschedule of the meeting on the 26th May (Bank holiday): We can't find an ideal schedule and we meet on the 9th of June.
* ACP Project proposal


= Participants =
* Filoretta Velica
* Hanne Vuegen
* Veerle Michiels
* Bart Decuypere
* Anne Nerenhausen
* José Costa Teixeira
* Philippe Baise


= Minutes =
* Reschedule of the meeting on the 26th May (Bank holiday): We can't find an ideal schedule and we meet on the 9th of June.

Presentation of the ACP Project Proposal
* Hypothetical question: If the PICT profile turns out to be incompatible with Manzana, what do we do? - we'll need to create 2 profiles (independent or interdependent, depending on the need) - if we find that ScoreResult is too strict, then we can still change ScoreResult. 
* We expect that this will not the case for the ScoreResult because ScoreResult is not specific for Manzana.

* Voting on approval of the proposal:
** We can validate the project proposal as usual: 
*** The Validation Working Group finds no objections today. 
*** Each group member will review the project proposal and will come back with any objections they may find by the 26th May. 
*** on the 27th of May, the Proposal will be considered approved if no objections arrive meanwhile. If some objections arrive, it will be handled on the meeting of the 9th June.

* New idea:
** We could have in the Validation meeting a 2-minute overview of all ongoing standardization projects - kind of a "report out" from the Technical WGs to the Validation WG. Just to inform the status.
** We'd reserve 15 minutes in each Validation meeting to listen to the reports and provide esssential comment (longer debates would be in the working groups)
** The responsibles could be the group facilitators, but it is not clear - so we give it a few weeks to consider this new proposal (status report from the Projects/WGs to the Validation Working Group) and we'll rediscuss in the next meeting.