Thursday, 12th May 2022, 10:00 CET

Agenda

Reschedule of the meeting on the 26th May (Bank holiday): We can't find an ideal schedule and we meet on the 9th of June.
ACP Project proposal

Participants

Reschedule of the meeting on the 26th May (Bank holiday): We can't find an ideal schedule and we meet on the 9th of June.

Presentation of the ACP Project Proposal

Hypothetical question: If the PICT profile turns out to be incompatible with Manzana, what do we do? - we'll need to create 2 profiles (independent or interdependent, depending on the need) - if we find that ScoreResult is too strict, then we can still change ScoreResult.
We expect that this will not the case for the ScoreResult because ScoreResult is not specific for Manzana.

Voting on approval of the proposal:
- We can validate the project proposal as usual:
  - The Validation Working Group finds no objections today.
  - Each group member will review the project proposal and will come back with any objections they may find by the 26th May.
  - on the 27th of May, the Proposal will be considered approved if no objections arrive meanwhile. If some objections arrive, it will be handled on the meeting of the 9th June.

New idea:
- We could have in the Validation meeting a 2-minute overview of all ongoing standardization projects - kind of a "report out" from the Technical WGs to the Validation WG. Just to inform the status.
- We'd reserve 15 minutes in each Validation meeting to listen to the reports and provide esssential comment (longer debates would be in the working groups)
- The responsibles could be the group facilitators, but it is not clear - so we give it a few weeks to consider this new proposal (status report from the Projects/WGs to the Validation Working Group) and we'll rediscuss in the next meeting.