Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-05-30"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
(Created page with "=== Attendees === * Alexis Van Zeveren * Annabel Dompas * Anne Nerenhausen * Antoine Praet * Bart Decuypere * Elien De Koker * Felix De Tavernier * Filip Veldeman * Hans De...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=== Attendees ===
 
=== Attendees ===
 
* Alexis Van Zeveren
 
* Alexis Van Zeveren
* Annabel Dompas
+
* Annabel Dompas (partially)
* Anne Nerenhausen
 
 
* Antoine Praet
 
* Antoine Praet
* Bart Decuypere
+
* Béatrice Nachtergaele
 +
* Cren Rosen
 
* Elien De Koker  
 
* Elien De Koker  
 +
* Elisabeth Buekers
 +
* Emmanuel de Grunne
 
* Felix De Tavernier
 
* Felix De Tavernier
 
* Filip Veldeman
 
* Filip Veldeman
 +
* Gilvano Torres
 
* Hans De Keersmaeker
 
* Hans De Keersmaeker
* Henk Lacour
 
* Henri Bostem
 
* Jean-Michel Polfliet
 
 
* Jens Penny
 
* Jens Penny
* José Costa Teixeira
+
* Johan Ex
 
+
* José Costa Teixeira (partially)
 +
* Julien Rademackers
 
* Karlien Erauw
 
* Karlien Erauw
 
* Kristel Van de Loock
 
* Kristel Van de Loock
 
* Marie-Alexandra Lambot
 
* Marie-Alexandra Lambot
 
* Pedro Diaz Lammertyn
 
* Pedro Diaz Lammertyn
* Tom Fiers
+
* Philippe Baise
 +
* Tom Andries
 +
* Tom Cloos
 
* Veerle Michiels
 
* Veerle Michiels
* Werner De Mulder
 
  
 
=== Excused ===
 
=== Excused ===
 
* Amber De Vos
 
* Amber De Vos
* Béatrice Nachtergaele
+
* Anne Nerenhausen
 +
* Bart Decuypere
 
* Cliff De Clercq
 
* Cliff De Clercq
* Cren Rosen
 
* Elisabeth Buekers
 
* Emmanuel de Grunne
 
 
* Faustin Murego
 
* Faustin Murego
 
* Félix De Tavernier
 
* Félix De Tavernier
Line 35: Line 35:
 
* François Depelchin
 
* François Depelchin
 
* Hanne Vuegen
 
* Hanne Vuegen
 +
* Henk Lacour
 +
* Henri Bostem
 +
* Jean-Michel Polfliet
 
* Isabelle Pollet
 
* Isabelle Pollet
 
* Jerno Thys
 
* Jerno Thys
* Julien Rademackers
 
 
* Kim Huygens
 
* Kim Huygens
 
* Kris Van Hauwermeiren
 
* Kris Van Hauwermeiren
Line 43: Line 45:
 
* Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
 
* Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
 
* Olivier Dobeli
 
* Olivier Dobeli
* Philippe Baise
 
 
* Samuel Vandenbussche
 
* Samuel Vandenbussche
* Tom Cloos
+
* Tom Fiers
 
+
* Werner De Mulder
  
 
=== Agenda ===
 
=== Agenda ===
Line 52: Line 53:
  
 
=== Minutes ===
 
=== Minutes ===
* Address urgent open questions/issues
+
* New issues have been created and need to be looked into: as from next meeting
::* https://github.com/hl7-be/core-clinical/issues/32: WG decides that a separate meeting is needed to discuss the business and technical aspects more in detail. Karlien will set this up. The outcome will be presented afterwards to this WG for your feedback.
+
* Diabetes observation
 +
::* for diabetes care, the evolution is more important than the last day/week evolution
 +
::::* evolutions during at least 14 days/a month
 +
::::* what would be the frequency to make the report available/sync'ed with the vaults, f.e. a weekly basis
 +
::::::* would there be a pull possibility for critical care ?
 +
::::::::* technically it is possible, it will have to be decided if this use case is needed for the business
 +
::::* do we want the raw data or do we want a report ? needs to be decided
 +
::::* it is a report that the physician makes and pushed the vaults, is a pdf/summary
 +
::::::* frequency of the report has to be determined: biweekly or monthly
 +
::::::* is it a physician validated or computer generated report : in our hubs/vaults system it should be validated by a clinician but is this applicable here ? 
 +
::::::* reports might have to be validated, do observations have to be validated ? This is a decision that needs to be taken at a higher level
 +
::::* which data would the report have ? the need depends on the type of clinician and type of condition
 +
::::::* question is asked whether GP softs need to import these data: no
  
::* https://github.com/hl7-be/core-clinical/issues/48: a document on diagnostic report and observation for diabetes has been shared. Anne presents this document
+
* Do we need to split observatino and problem in separate WG meetings ? Will be discussed at the HL7 Belgium members meeting on 30 May afternoon
::::* there will be a specific careset on observation
 
  
 
* Action items:  
 
* Action items:  
::* setup meeting on issue 32 (by Karlien)
+
::* address open issues
 
::* provide your feedback on document on diagnostic report and observation for diabetes
 
::* provide your feedback on document on diagnostic report and observation for diabetes
  
'''Next Patient Dossier/Observation & Problem WG meeting: 15 June May at 9AM'''
+
'''Next Patient Dossier/Observation & Problem WG meeting: 13 June May at 9AM'''

Latest revision as of 08:24, 30 May 2024

Attendees

  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Annabel Dompas (partially)
  • Antoine Praet
  • Béatrice Nachtergaele
  • Cren Rosen
  • Elien De Koker
  • Elisabeth Buekers
  • Emmanuel de Grunne
  • Felix De Tavernier
  • Filip Veldeman
  • Gilvano Torres
  • Hans De Keersmaeker
  • Jens Penny
  • Johan Ex
  • José Costa Teixeira (partially)
  • Julien Rademackers
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Kristel Van de Loock
  • Marie-Alexandra Lambot
  • Pedro Diaz Lammertyn
  • Philippe Baise
  • Tom Andries
  • Tom Cloos
  • Veerle Michiels

Excused

  • Amber De Vos
  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Cliff De Clercq
  • Faustin Murego
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Filoretta Velica
  • François Depelchin
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Henk Lacour
  • Henri Bostem
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Isabelle Pollet
  • Jerno Thys
  • Kim Huygens
  • Kris Van Hauwermeiren
  • Marcelo Romero-Cors
  • Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
  • Olivier Dobeli
  • Samuel Vandenbussche
  • Tom Fiers
  • Werner De Mulder

Agenda

  • work on logical model, diagnostic report and observation for observation and more in particular for diabetes

Minutes

  • New issues have been created and need to be looked into: as from next meeting
  • Diabetes observation
  • for diabetes care, the evolution is more important than the last day/week evolution
  • evolutions during at least 14 days/a month
  • what would be the frequency to make the report available/sync'ed with the vaults, f.e. a weekly basis
  • would there be a pull possibility for critical care ?
  • technically it is possible, it will have to be decided if this use case is needed for the business
  • do we want the raw data or do we want a report ? needs to be decided
  • it is a report that the physician makes and pushed the vaults, is a pdf/summary
  • frequency of the report has to be determined: biweekly or monthly
  • is it a physician validated or computer generated report : in our hubs/vaults system it should be validated by a clinician but is this applicable here ?
  • reports might have to be validated, do observations have to be validated ? This is a decision that needs to be taken at a higher level
  • which data would the report have ? the need depends on the type of clinician and type of condition
  • question is asked whether GP softs need to import these data: no
  • Do we need to split observatino and problem in separate WG meetings ? Will be discussed at the HL7 Belgium members meeting on 30 May afternoon
  • Action items:
  • address open issues
  • provide your feedback on document on diagnostic report and observation for diabetes

Next Patient Dossier/Observation & Problem WG meeting: 13 June May at 9AM