Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-05-30"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=== Attendees === * Alexis Van Zeveren * Annabel Dompas * Anne Nerenhausen * Antoine Praet * Bart Decuypere * Elien De Koker * Felix De Tavernier * Filip Veldeman * Hans De...") |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Attendees === | === Attendees === | ||
* Alexis Van Zeveren | * Alexis Van Zeveren | ||
− | * Annabel Dompas | + | * Annabel Dompas (partially) |
− | |||
* Antoine Praet | * Antoine Praet | ||
− | * | + | * Béatrice Nachtergaele |
+ | * Cren Rosen | ||
* Elien De Koker | * Elien De Koker | ||
+ | * Elisabeth Buekers | ||
+ | * Emmanuel de Grunne | ||
* Felix De Tavernier | * Felix De Tavernier | ||
* Filip Veldeman | * Filip Veldeman | ||
+ | * Gilvano Torres | ||
* Hans De Keersmaeker | * Hans De Keersmaeker | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* Jens Penny | * Jens Penny | ||
− | * José Costa Teixeira | + | * Johan Ex |
− | + | * José Costa Teixeira (partially) | |
+ | * Julien Rademackers | ||
* Karlien Erauw | * Karlien Erauw | ||
* Kristel Van de Loock | * Kristel Van de Loock | ||
* Marie-Alexandra Lambot | * Marie-Alexandra Lambot | ||
* Pedro Diaz Lammertyn | * Pedro Diaz Lammertyn | ||
− | * Tom | + | * Philippe Baise |
+ | * Tom Andries | ||
+ | * Tom Cloos | ||
* Veerle Michiels | * Veerle Michiels | ||
− | |||
=== Excused === | === Excused === | ||
* Amber De Vos | * Amber De Vos | ||
− | * | + | * Anne Nerenhausen |
+ | * Bart Decuypere | ||
* Cliff De Clercq | * Cliff De Clercq | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* Faustin Murego | * Faustin Murego | ||
* Félix De Tavernier | * Félix De Tavernier | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* François Depelchin | * François Depelchin | ||
* Hanne Vuegen | * Hanne Vuegen | ||
+ | * Henk Lacour | ||
+ | * Henri Bostem | ||
+ | * Jean-Michel Polfliet | ||
* Isabelle Pollet | * Isabelle Pollet | ||
* Jerno Thys | * Jerno Thys | ||
− | |||
* Kim Huygens | * Kim Huygens | ||
* Kris Van Hauwermeiren | * Kris Van Hauwermeiren | ||
Line 43: | Line 45: | ||
* Nico Vannieuwenhuyze | * Nico Vannieuwenhuyze | ||
* Olivier Dobeli | * Olivier Dobeli | ||
− | |||
* Samuel Vandenbussche | * Samuel Vandenbussche | ||
− | * Tom | + | * Tom Fiers |
+ | * Werner De Mulder | ||
Line 52: | Line 54: | ||
=== Minutes === | === Minutes === | ||
− | * | + | * New issues have been created and need to be looked into: as from next meeting |
− | ::* | + | * Diabetes observation |
+ | ::* for diabetes care, the evolution is more important than the last day/week evolution | ||
+ | ::::* evolutions during at least 14 days/a month | ||
+ | ::::* what would be the frequency to make the report available/sync'ed with the vaults, f.e. a weekly basis | ||
+ | ::::::* would there be a pull possibility for critical care ? | ||
+ | ::::::::* technically it is possible, it will have to be decided if this use case is needed for the business | ||
+ | ::::* do we want the raw data or do we want a report ? needs to be decided | ||
+ | ::::* it is a report that the physician makes and pushed the vaults, is a pdf/summary | ||
+ | ::::::* frequency of the report has to be determined: biweekly or monthly | ||
+ | ::::::* is it a physician validated or computer generated report : in our hubs/vaults system it should be validated by a clinician but is this applicable here ? | ||
+ | ::::::* reports might have to be validated, do observations have to be validated ? This is a decision that needs to be taken at a higher level | ||
+ | ::::* which data would the report have ? the need depends on the type of clinician and type of condition | ||
+ | ::::::* question is asked whether GP softs need to import these data: no | ||
− | + | * Do we need to split observatino and problem in separate WG meetings ? Will be discussed at the HL7 Belgium members meeting on 30 May afternoon | |
− | |||
* Action items: | * Action items: | ||
− | ::* | + | ::* address open issues |
::* provide your feedback on document on diagnostic report and observation for diabetes | ::* provide your feedback on document on diagnostic report and observation for diabetes | ||
'''Next Patient Dossier/Observation & Problem WG meeting: 15 June May at 9AM''' | '''Next Patient Dossier/Observation & Problem WG meeting: 15 June May at 9AM''' |
Revision as of 08:10, 30 May 2024
Contents
Attendees
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Annabel Dompas (partially)
- Antoine Praet
- Béatrice Nachtergaele
- Cren Rosen
- Elien De Koker
- Elisabeth Buekers
- Emmanuel de Grunne
- Felix De Tavernier
- Filip Veldeman
- Gilvano Torres
- Hans De Keersmaeker
- Jens Penny
- Johan Ex
- José Costa Teixeira (partially)
- Julien Rademackers
- Karlien Erauw
- Kristel Van de Loock
- Marie-Alexandra Lambot
- Pedro Diaz Lammertyn
- Philippe Baise
- Tom Andries
- Tom Cloos
- Veerle Michiels
Excused
- Amber De Vos
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Bart Decuypere
- Cliff De Clercq
- Faustin Murego
- Félix De Tavernier
- Filoretta Velica
- François Depelchin
- Hanne Vuegen
- Henk Lacour
- Henri Bostem
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Isabelle Pollet
- Jerno Thys
- Kim Huygens
- Kris Van Hauwermeiren
- Marcelo Romero-Cors
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Olivier Dobeli
- Samuel Vandenbussche
- Tom Fiers
- Werner De Mulder
Agenda
- work on logical model, diagnostic report and observation for observation and more in particular for diabetes
Minutes
- New issues have been created and need to be looked into: as from next meeting
- Diabetes observation
- for diabetes care, the evolution is more important than the last day/week evolution
- evolutions during at least 14 days/a month
- what would be the frequency to make the report available/sync'ed with the vaults, f.e. a weekly basis
- would there be a pull possibility for critical care ?
- technically it is possible, it will have to be decided if this use case is needed for the business
- do we want the raw data or do we want a report ? needs to be decided
- it is a report that the physician makes and pushed the vaults, is a pdf/summary
- frequency of the report has to be determined: biweekly or monthly
- is it a physician validated or computer generated report : in our hubs/vaults system it should be validated by a clinician but is this applicable here ?
- reports might have to be validated, do observations have to be validated ? This is a decision that needs to be taken at a higher level
- which data would the report have ? the need depends on the type of clinician and type of condition
- question is asked whether GP softs need to import these data: no
- Do we need to split observatino and problem in separate WG meetings ? Will be discussed at the HL7 Belgium members meeting on 30 May afternoon
- Action items:
- address open issues
- provide your feedback on document on diagnostic report and observation for diabetes
Next Patient Dossier/Observation & Problem WG meeting: 15 June May at 9AM