Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Security WG 2021-06-18"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===== Attendees ===== * Bart Rondou x * Félix De Tavernier x * Hannes De Clercq x * Jan Lenie x * José Costa Teixeira * Karlien Erauw x * Nick Hermans x * Pablo d'Alcantara...") |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* IBP services that will be run by institutions, a request has already been raised (Helena & Belrai Flanders already uses this paradigm) | * IBP services that will be run by institutions, a request has already been raised (Helena & Belrai Flanders already uses this paradigm) | ||
* some organisations want to host their own FHIR server: IBP that connects to IAM can be a solution ? | * some organisations want to host their own FHIR server: IBP that connects to IAM can be a solution ? | ||
| + | ::* not possible for a small organisation to have own IDP | ||
| + | ::* bigger organisations (CoT) can use this having a trust relationship with the eHealth platform | ||
Revision as of 10:19, 18 June 2021
Attendees
- Bart Rondou x
- Félix De Tavernier x
- Hannes De Clercq x
- Jan Lenie x
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw x
- Nick Hermans x
- Pablo d'Alcantara x
Excused/Not present
- Bruno Casneuf
- Didier Temans
- Erwin Bellon
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Raphaël Marbaix
- Robin Bosman
Agenda
- IBP services
Minutes
- Hannes did not have time to visualize the workflow
- Mappings will have to be provided
- IBP services that will be run by institutions, a request has already been raised (Helena & Belrai Flanders already uses this paradigm)
- some organisations want to host their own FHIR server: IBP that connects to IAM can be a solution ?
- not possible for a small organisation to have own IDP
- bigger organisations (CoT) can use this having a trust relationship with the eHealth platform
