Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2022-02-15"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
* Issue 93: what does the GP soft do if the FHIR format is not correct ? | * Issue 93: what does the GP soft do if the FHIR format is not correct ? | ||
::* combination of labo and GP software | ::* combination of labo and GP software | ||
− | ::* central repository is necessary that indicates which formats a GP/GP soft (per RIZIV number) can receive (Medidoc, FHIR, ...), having language of GP is also useful for labo | + | ::* central repository is necessary that indicates which formats a GP/GP soft (per RIZIV number) can receive (Medidoc, FHIR, ...), having the language of GP is also useful for labo |
− | ::::* this | + | ::::* this has been raised to the eHealth platform |
::::* option is to include this in the COBHRA addressbook managed by the caregiver | ::::* option is to include this in the COBHRA addressbook managed by the caregiver | ||
* Issue 94 : New interpretation coded set: how to correctly refer to the set | * Issue 94 : New interpretation coded set: how to correctly refer to the set | ||
::* to interpret a result we have a valueset but the reference is giving errors | ::* to interpret a result we have a valueset but the reference is giving errors | ||
− | ::* a subset of the HL7 int'l set is used but it is giving errors at validator level | + | ::* a subset of the HL7 int'l set is used but it is giving errors at validator level; to be corrected |
* Issue 91 : in the Belgian standard one performer value is mandatory | * Issue 91 : in the Belgian standard one performer value is mandatory | ||
− | ::* diagnostic report - performer : could be labo - profile will be changed and guidance has to be | + | ::* diagnostic report - performer : could be labo - profile will be changed and guidance has to be modified |
− | ::* interpreter : validator of the report, is practioner, | + | ::* interpreter : validator of the report, is practioner, it can be more than one |
− | ::* author on composition level: is this a person or organization - does this have to be | + | ::* author on composition level: is this a person or organization - does this have to be sent, is not mandatory ; we agree that this is the lab (as organisation) as the info is mandatory in the int'l profile so cannot be changed |
* '''Action items''': | * '''Action items''': | ||
− | ::* | + | ::* update profile and guidance |
'''Next Meeting: on Tuesday March 8 4PM - please note that this is in 3 weeks !''' | '''Next Meeting: on Tuesday March 8 4PM - please note that this is in 3 weeks !''' |
Latest revision as of 08:34, 16 February 2022
Attendees
- Dr Alain Derom
- Bart Decuypere
- Bart Havermans
- Benny Verhamme
- Frederik Lenaerts
- Hans De Keersmaecker
- Jos Bellen
- Karlien Erauw
- Kristof Jaubin
- Lotte Adriaensen
- Nick Hermans - joined late
- Olivier Lothaire
- Philippe Cauchie
- Stefan Waegemans
- Sven Bisaro
- Thibault Mahieu
- Tom Fiers
- Tom Tollenaere
- Yulia Shornikova
Excused/Not present
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Frédéric Istace
- Frederik De Kegel
- Filip Migom
- Hendrik De Moor
- Jean-Michel Polfiet
- Joost Van Averbeke
- Jos Bellen
- José Costa Teixeira
- Mieke Buckinx
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Paul Neyens
- Peter Laridon
- Richard Francken
- Robert Nicolas
- Roland Vueghs
- Theo Schumacher
- Toon Schiemsky
- Richard Francken
- Veerle Claessens
- Werner De Mulder
Agenda
- Discuss and resolve open issues i.e. issue 91 - 92 - 93 - 94
Minutes
- Up-to-date list of issues can be consulted here
- Issue 21: copy physicians - will be on hold until the lab order will be implemented
- Issue 92: new issue "mime-type FHIR" raised by UZ Gent
- which mime type to use ?
- we recommend the FHIR mime types: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/http.html#mime-type
- if mime type is transferred as metadata this is not checked
- it is recommended that there is validated that the FHIR mime is used
- Issue 93: what does the GP soft do if the FHIR format is not correct ?
- combination of labo and GP software
- central repository is necessary that indicates which formats a GP/GP soft (per RIZIV number) can receive (Medidoc, FHIR, ...), having the language of GP is also useful for labo
- this has been raised to the eHealth platform
- option is to include this in the COBHRA addressbook managed by the caregiver
- Issue 94 : New interpretation coded set: how to correctly refer to the set
- to interpret a result we have a valueset but the reference is giving errors
- a subset of the HL7 int'l set is used but it is giving errors at validator level; to be corrected
- Issue 91 : in the Belgian standard one performer value is mandatory
- diagnostic report - performer : could be labo - profile will be changed and guidance has to be modified
- interpreter : validator of the report, is practioner, it can be more than one
- author on composition level: is this a person or organization - does this have to be sent, is not mandatory ; we agree that this is the lab (as organisation) as the info is mandatory in the int'l profile so cannot be changed
- Action items:
- update profile and guidance
Next Meeting: on Tuesday March 8 4PM - please note that this is in 3 weeks !