Minutes - Medication WG 2021-11-09
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 10:16, 9 November 2021 by KarlienErauw (talk | contribs)
Attendees
- Annemieke Vergauwe
- Bart Decuypere
- Bruno Casneuf
- Jan Lenie
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Pablo Christiaens
Excused/Not present
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Dieter Sauvillers
- Elhassan Baazizi
- Hanne Vuegen
- Jean-Louis Maggetto
- Jens Penny
- Jeroen De Wilde
- José Costa Teixeira
- Katrien Thorré
- Lars Vanreppelen
- Marc Buckens
- Nick Hermans
- Nils Devos
- Richard Francken
- Tom Henkens
- Thomas Van Langendonck
- Tom De Backer
- Will van Norel
Agenda
continue discussion open questions
- is indication mandatory ?
- what with multiple indications in multiple therapeutic lines ?
- how to capture the history in the medication scheme ?
Minutes
- Indication cannot be mandatory and can be free text
- Multiple indications in multiple therapeutic lines
- do we need to capture the history in the medication scheme ?
- 3 therapeutic lines that are linked - these are foreseen in the sumehr (as medication history as free text) - do you need to connect the medication ?
- what will the medication sheme be used for ?
- there should be a patient friendly print-out for the patient, which will be a different view of the medication scheme
- history can be of value for GP and pharmacist
- how will the GP use this ?
- re-use therapeutic line
- start new therapeutic line
- it is not because computer systems keep history eternally that the eternal history has to be displayed - only history that has relevance should be displayed, has to be determined by the application that shows the medication (timeframe, specific datasets, ...)
- not having the medication history (when manually deleted) today is painful
- Due to José's absence the questions/open issues have been listed and they will be further discussed during our next meeting
Action items for next meeting
Next meeting Dec 7 at 11AM
