Minutes - Referral WG 2023-07-07

Attendees

• Anne Nerenhausen
• Bart Decuypere
• Bart Reekmans
• Elliot Ananaba (smals)
• Emily Sevrin
• Geert Vandenhole
• Jean-Michel Polfliet
• Julien Beard
• Karlien Erauw
• Maarten Cobbaert
• Maxime Daive
• Philippe Lejoly
• Robin Merckx

Excused

• Alexis Van Zeveren
• Anthony Maton
• Ben Goosse
• Christophe Behaegel
• Cyprien Janssens
• Dorsan de Fabricheckers
• Hans De Keersmaecker
• Jacques Yakoub
• Jean-Francois Coquelet
• José Costa Teixeira
• Katleen Smedts
• Katrien Dickx
• Katrien Thorré
• Lionel Cremer
• Marleen Van Eygen
• Nathan Peeters
• Laurent Lamouline
• Pablo Christiaens
• Pieter Devolder
• Philippe Baise
• Richard Francken

Agenda

• continue resolution of issues

Meeting Minutes

• Project Update

• cookbook pseudonmisation is missing details, a new update will be released by eHealth Platform, no update yet on when we might expect this

• Update from Julien on an enhanced offer/comodity for integrators using $graph:

• it is part of the October release and does not have any impact on the June release

• it is demonstrated in an example : there is a SR, a requester, practionerRole, all the tasks (global and performer tasks), all caregivers, when calling the graph you will get the resources in a bundle
• the example will be added to the IG

• Continue resolution of issues
• issue 250: no update from Maarten from the business

• it should be possible to assign two different caregivers or performers, so the cardinality should be 1 to many
• so we need to add an extension

• issue 257 nd issue 256: await discussion in HL7 BE WG infrastructure and security on 13 July

• Consultation of a list of BeReferralPrescriptions - also with nihii number

• both niss and inami number will be available but inami number will be optional, niss is mandatory
• will they be available only for search ? it seems vitalink also needs this
• some more analysis will be done

• issue 254

• why not allow resource logical "identifier" to be used instead of technical "id" to reference a resource?
• DPO needs to be consulted here, we are still aiming for this solutions
• it is being looked to add a FHIR facade to Cobhra to manage practioners and practioners roles but there are only premature discussions ongoing

• issue 242

• this is for the next release but awaiting info from project team

• issue 77

• NIC needs to validate and will need to develop a field, there seems to be a need for some minor adjustments
• goal is to have one file, in what you see and what you send to NIC and INAMI for wound care & referral prescriptions

• issue 210

• Bart will check and close the issue

• issue 215 and issue 218: are linked

• it is still linked to resources that might be needed for devices, is ongoing

• issue 228

• discussions are still ongoing, the doctor is still the prescriber in the case of annex 81 although the nurse triggers it. There is a validation needed by the doctor. The nurse creates and completes and signs the annex 81 doc, the doctor signs/agrees with the nurse. The nurse is only the recorder
• issue can be closed

Agenda next meeting

• continue resolution of issues and presentation of use cases

Next meeting: Friday 25 August at 9AM