Minutes - Referral WG 2023-07-07
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Attendees
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Bart Decuypere
- Bart Reekmans
- Elliot Ananaba (smals)
- Emily Sevrin
- Geert Vandenhole
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Julien Beard
- Karlien Erauw
- Maarten Cobbaert
- Maxime Daive
- Philippe Lejoly
- Robin Merckx
Excused
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Anthony Maton
- Ben Goosse
- Christophe Behaegel
- Cyprien Janssens
- Dorsan de Fabricheckers
- Hans De Keersmaecker
- Jacques Yakoub
- Jean-Francois Coquelet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Katleen Smedts
- Katrien Dickx
- Katrien Thorré
- Lionel Cremer
- Marleen Van Eygen
- Nathan Peeters
- Laurent Lamouline
- Pablo Christiaens
- Pieter Devolder
- Philippe Baise
- Richard Francken
Agenda
- continue resolution of issues
Meeting Minutes
- Project Update
- cookbook pseudonmisation is missing details, a new update will be released by eHealth Platform, no update yet on when we might expect this
- Update from Julien on an enhanced offer/comodity for integrators using $graph:
- it is part of the October release and does not have any impact on the June release
- it is demonstrated in an example : there is a SR, a requester, practionerRole, all the tasks (global and performer tasks), all caregivers, when calling the graph you will get the resources in a bundle
- the example will be added to the IG
- Continue resolution of issues
- issue 250: no update from Maarten from the business
- it should be possible to assign two different caregivers or performers, so the cardinality should be 1 to many
- so we need to add an extension
- both niss and inami number will be available but inami number will be optional, niss is mandatory
- will they be available only for search ? it seems vitalink also needs this
- some more analysis will be done
- why not allow resource logical "identifier" to be used instead of technical "id" to reference a resource?
- DPO needs to be consulted here, we are still aiming for this solutions
- it is being looked to add a FHIR facade to Cobhra to manage practioners and practioners roles but there are only premature discussions ongoing
- this is for the next release but awaiting info from project team
- NIC needs to validate and will need to develop a field, there seems to be a need for some minor adjustments
- goal is to have one file, in what you see and what you send to NIC and INAMI for wound care & referral prescriptions
- Bart will check and close the issue
- it is still linked to resources that might be needed for devices, is ongoing
- discussions are still ongoing, the doctor is still the prescriber in the case of annex 81 although the nurse triggers it. There is a validation needed by the doctor. The nurse creates and completes and signs the annex 81 doc, the doctor signs/agrees with the nurse. The nurse is only the recorder
- issue can be closed
Agenda next meeting
- continue resolution of issues and presentation of use cases
Next meeting: Friday 25 August at 9AM
