Minutes - Core Profiles WG 2024-03-20

Attendees

• Bart Decuypere
• Benny Verhamme
• Brian Thieren
• Dominiek Leclerq
• Elien De Koker
• Hanne Vuegen
• Ivan Coppieters
• Jean-Michel Polfliet
• Karlien Erauw
• Marcelo Romero-Cors
• Maxime Caucheteur
• Pablo Christiaens
• Philippe Baise
• Werner De Mulder

Excused/Not present

• Anne Nerenhausen
• Anthony Maton
• Benny Verhamme
• Brecht Van Vooren
• Cyprien Janssens
• Didier Temans
• Erwin Bellon
• Félix De Tavernier
• Filoretta Velica
• Isabelle Pollet
• José Costa Teixeira
• Lodewijk Sioen
• Marco Busschots
• Nick Hermans
• Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
• Philip Sidgwick
• Stef Hoofd
• Steven Van den Berghe

Agenda

• resolution of issues

Minutes

• Last time we agreed on the solution proposed for the Document Reference

• the logical model for Document Reference is presented, see here https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/core/StructureDefinition-BeModelPatientDocument.html
• it is called Patient Document

• we review the IG Document Reference, see here

• we resolved issue 72
• we miss, we create
• we also want organisation as author type, and also patient ; no need to exclude any types (there is no Be profile for device) ; do we need a BE profile for related person, int'l profile is now used, we might need a BE profile

• we also need relationship type, legal representative (in be related person ?)

• Resolution of issues

• https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/37
• https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/38

• Resolution of issues

• https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/73

• logical model for BeCommunication has not yet been prepared, HL7 Belgium core team will prepare this work for the next meeting

• https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/70: can be closed as it was a non-issue

• some work needs to be done on other logical models for profiles that exist since a long time ; input from RIZIV will be necessary

• https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/38

• does the gender have to be mandatory, it is often very useful but it is not mandatory for some use cases ; for GDPR matters you have to be looked at data minimalization
• the WG agrees that the gender should not be mandatory (some systems will have to do an impact analysis when this change will be applied)
• However, each specification is free to impose some constraints on the presence of the gender. We will describe this in the guidance of the core IG.

Next agenda meeting agenda points

• move to new version of the core profile, v2.0
• resolution of issues f.e. 76

Next meetings

• Wednesday 3 April at 9AM and 17 April at 10AM