Minutes - Core Profiles WG 2024-04-17

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Attendees
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Brian Thieren
  • Dominiek Leclerq
  • Ivan Coppieters
  • Jacques Yakoub
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Marcelo Romero-Cors
  • Maxime Caucheteur
  • Philippe Baise
  • Ruben Walraevens
  • Steven Van den Berghe (first part)
Excused/Not present
  • Annabel Dompas
  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Anthony Maton
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Cyprien Janssens
  • Didier Temans
  • Elien De Koker
  • Erwin Bellon
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Filoretta Velica
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Isabelle Pollet
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Lodewijk Sioen
  • Nick Hermans
  • Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Philip Sidgwick
  • Stef Hoofd
  • Werner De Mulder
Agenda
Minutes
  • issue 93 and 98 can be closed as 93 is resolved and 98 will be resolved
  • issue 91: we do not care about the place of death
  • we propose the recently made changes
  • logical model has been adapted: birth with address and date, gender (admin, at birth, social)
  • change name of boolean field into "deceased" instead of death: new issue create 91
  • this change will be done and then the profile will be merged into the main branch
  • we look into the discussion on chat.fhir.org 179166
  • how will we model the related person regarding legal representative and trusted person, what elements do we need
  • there are 2 aspects: relationship (brother, neighboor) and role (legal, trusted)
  • available valuesets are confusing and not workable though
  • can relationship be limited in time: this is a possibility
  • remarks are put in the issue
  • can we use the same approach as for the patient ? do we need to put them as mustSupport or mandatory ?
  • we need feedback from softs
  • there are different aspects at text and display level f.e. from terminology experts there is a request to add an extension to have the entry of the original language as the HCP is legally bounded to his entry, these values don't need to be displayed
  • issue is updated, we will be forced to make changes, we will need an extension, to be determined at which level, needs some investigation


Next agenda meeting agenda points
Next meeting
  • May 1 is a public holiday so this meeting will be re-schedulded to Wednesday 8 May at 9AM