Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Core Profiles WG 2024-04-17"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===== Attendees ===== * Bart Decuypere * Benny Verhamme * Brian Thieren * Dominiek Leclerq * Ivan Coppieters * Marcelo Romero-Cors * Maxime Caucheteur * Pablo Christiaens *...") |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Dominiek Leclerq | * Dominiek Leclerq | ||
* Ivan Coppieters | * Ivan Coppieters | ||
− | + | * Jacques Yakoub | |
− | + | * Karlien Erauw | |
* Marcelo Romero-Cors | * Marcelo Romero-Cors | ||
* Maxime Caucheteur | * Maxime Caucheteur | ||
− | |||
* Philippe Baise | * Philippe Baise | ||
* Ruben Walraevens | * Ruben Walraevens | ||
− | * Steven Van den Berghe | + | * Steven Van den Berghe (first part) |
− | |||
===== Excused/Not present ===== | ===== Excused/Not present ===== | ||
Line 31: | Line 29: | ||
* Jean-Michel Polfliet | * Jean-Michel Polfliet | ||
* José Costa Teixeira | * José Costa Teixeira | ||
− | |||
* Lodewijk Sioen | * Lodewijk Sioen | ||
* Nick Hermans | * Nick Hermans | ||
* Nico Vannieuwenhuyze | * Nico Vannieuwenhuyze | ||
+ | * Pablo Christiaens | ||
* Philip Sidgwick | * Philip Sidgwick | ||
* Stef Hoofd | * Stef Hoofd | ||
+ | * Werner De Mulder | ||
===== Agenda ===== | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
Line 56: | Line 55: | ||
::::* how will we model the related person regarding legal representative and trusted person, what elements do we need | ::::* how will we model the related person regarding legal representative and trusted person, what elements do we need | ||
::::::* there are 2 aspects: relationship (brother, neighboor) and role (legal, trusted) | ::::::* there are 2 aspects: relationship (brother, neighboor) and role (legal, trusted) | ||
− | ::::::::* available [https://ehealth.fgov.be/standards/fhir/core/ValueSet-be-vs-patient-relationship-type.html valuesets] are confusing though | + | ::::::::* available [https://ehealth.fgov.be/standards/fhir/core/ValueSet-be-vs-patient-relationship-type.html valuesets] are confusing and not workable though |
+ | ::::::::* can relationship be limited in time: this is a possibility | ||
+ | ::::::* remarks are put in the issue | ||
+ | ::::::* can we use the same approach as for the patient ? do we need to put them as mustSupport or mandatory ? | ||
+ | ::::* we need feedback from softs | ||
+ | ::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/76 issue 76] : Felix is not present | ||
+ | ::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/69 issue 69] : | ||
+ | ::::* there are different aspects at text and display level f.e. from terminology experts there is a request to add an extension to have the entry of the original language as the HCP is legally bounded to his entry, these values don't need to be displayed | ||
+ | ::::* issue is updated, we will be forced to make changes, we will need an extension, to be determined at which level, needs some investigation | ||
Line 64: | Line 71: | ||
===== Next meeting ===== | ===== Next meeting ===== | ||
− | * May 1 is a public holiday so | + | * May 1 is a public holiday so this meeting will be re-schedulded to Wednesday 8 May at 9AM |
Latest revision as of 13:19, 24 April 2024
Contents
Attendees
- Bart Decuypere
- Benny Verhamme
- Brian Thieren
- Dominiek Leclerq
- Ivan Coppieters
- Jacques Yakoub
- Karlien Erauw
- Marcelo Romero-Cors
- Maxime Caucheteur
- Philippe Baise
- Ruben Walraevens
- Steven Van den Berghe (first part)
Excused/Not present
- Annabel Dompas
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Anthony Maton
- Benny Verhamme
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Cyprien Janssens
- Didier Temans
- Elien De Koker
- Erwin Bellon
- Félix De Tavernier
- Filoretta Velica
- Hanne Vuegen
- Isabelle Pollet
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Lodewijk Sioen
- Nick Hermans
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Pablo Christiaens
- Philip Sidgwick
- Stef Hoofd
- Werner De Mulder
Agenda
- resolution of issues
Minutes
- resolution of issues
- issue 93 and 98 can be closed as 93 is resolved and 98 will be resolved
- issue 91: we do not care about the place of death
- we propose the recently made changes
- issue 37 related the nat'l register and the corresponding logical model for the patient
- logical model has been adapted: birth with address and date, gender (admin, at birth, social)
- change name of boolean field into "deceased" instead of death: new issue create 91
- this change will be done and then the profile will be merged into the main branch
- issue 78 on Related person,
- we look into the discussion on chat.fhir.org 179166
- how will we model the related person regarding legal representative and trusted person, what elements do we need
- there are 2 aspects: relationship (brother, neighboor) and role (legal, trusted)
- available valuesets are confusing and not workable though
- can relationship be limited in time: this is a possibility
- remarks are put in the issue
- can we use the same approach as for the patient ? do we need to put them as mustSupport or mandatory ?
- we need feedback from softs
-
- there are different aspects at text and display level f.e. from terminology experts there is a request to add an extension to have the entry of the original language as the HCP is legally bounded to his entry, these values don't need to be displayed
- issue is updated, we will be forced to make changes, we will need an extension, to be determined at which level, needs some investigation
-
Next agenda meeting agenda points
- Resolution of issues
Next meeting
- May 1 is a public holiday so this meeting will be re-schedulded to Wednesday 8 May at 9AM