Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-09-21
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Contents
Attendees
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Félix De Tavernier
- Hanne Vuegen
- Hans De Keersmaeker
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Pablo Christiaens
- Veerle Michiels
- Wouter De Jonghe
Excused
- Bart Decuypere
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Filoretta Velica
- Isabelle Pollet
- Jens Penny
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Nick Hermans
- Philippe Baise
- Sam Jocqué
- Tom De Backer
- Walter Bollaert
Agenda
- Resolve issue/questions
Minutes
- The business rules document can be found here in NL and here in French:
- see also in issue 12
- The work on the implementation guide has started, no updates
- We will go over the issues, see here
- issue 13 representative linked to willcode:
- it might be useful to be able to put one representative for all will codes, other info might be useful
- issue 11: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode
- the will code will be made mandatory in the logical model as this corresponds with the most important information, it corresponds with consent provision code in FHIR
- the category is FHIR int'l model is mandatory and is very similar to scope
- more investigation is necessary by eHealth platform
- issue 10: performer vs organisation
- the representative (mandaathouder) is in the logical model but not in the IG yet --> it is the custodian
- where do we get the INSZ number for a notary/judge ?
- do we need another type of representative ? trusted person?
- can the custodian be the same person as the performer ? normally not
- concepts and business rules need to be clarified by INAMI
- we create a new issue 14 : the group thinks that the notary document might have to be availabe at the HCP side, could we link ? to be investigated and specified in
- issue 9: update/remove links to artefacts
- it is a temporary version of the IG, the links will be updated by eHealth platform
- issue 8: kmehr/FHIR mapping
- for all existing documents in kmehr and the valuesets used there, a mapping to the FHIR valuesets is needed
- how are we going to tackle this ?
- see 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 in the business rules WillCategory and WillCode
- we will only add values to the existing kmehr values
- it seems that some kmehr values have been removed and some have not been mapped
- FHIR mapping: Category (logical) should not be mapped on Scope (FHIR) and Willcode (logical) should not be mapped on Category (fhir)
- Alexis prefers to have this in a FHIR concept map
- we need user friendly tools to support this
- Next actions:
- continue resolution of issues
Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 5 Oct Sep at 9AM
