Minutes - Referral WG 2022-03-08

Attendees

• Dr Alain Derom
• Bart Decuypere
• Bart Havermans
• Filip Migom
• Frederik De Kegel
• Frederik Lenaerts
• Hans De Keersmaecker
• Jean-Michel Polfiet
• Jos Bellen
• Karlien Erauw
• Kristof Jaubin
• Lotte Adriaensen
• Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
• Olivier Lothaire
• Peter Laridon
• Philippe Cauchie
• Richard Francken
• Stefan Waegemans
• Sven Bisaro
• Thibault Mahieu
• Tom Tollenaere

Excused/Not present

• Alexis Van Zeveren
• Benny Verhamme
• Frédéric Istace
• Hendrik De Moor
• Joost Van Averbeke
• José Costa Teixeira
• Mieke Buckinx
• Nick Hermans
• Paul Neyens
• Robert Nicolas
• Roland Vueghs
• Theo Schumacher
• Tom Fiers
• Toon Schiemsky
• Veerle Claessens
• Werner De Mulder
• Yulia Shornikova

Agenda

• Discuss and resolve open issues

Minutes

• Status of pilot & project :

• communication plan is being set-up to have an information letter for each type of stakeholder (labs, hospitals, GP softs)
• Planning for the whole of project will be presented in the Begeleidingscomit2 - must be validated
• Use of FHIR as means of communicating : currently at lab end, a central solution is being considered and analysed

• Physician supporting the FHIR standard will be kept in a central database, not in the eHealth addressbook
• Infosession on the project will happen in April
• Listing all questions from f.e. GP softs will be useful to be sent to the PM prior to the infosession

• Other business:

• CHU Charleroi is not able to test a lot as there is a translator issue & LIS version
• in how many % is there no LOINC code ? can be up to 5-7% where there is no appropriate LOINC code in the Belgian subset

• Up-to-date list of FHIR issues can be consulted here
• Issue 97: antibiotic result values

• always take most specific LOINC code - okµ::* to be added to the guidance

• Issue 98: accreditation comment -what & how ?

• do we want to have a common way ? this is not realistic

• putting info next to each test will cause overload

• every implementer is free to put info on the accreditation

• accreditation info can be put at observation level
• at organisation level the Belac status can be put
• advice from José needed

• Issue 106:

• yes, extend with RIS but there might be other issues, we will have to extend further so all limitations will have to be removed, i.e. go with int'l FHIR standard

Agenda for next meeting:

• come to a consensus on the open issues - please have a look at the proposed solution for the issues in status "To be validated by WG"

Next Meeting - next week as there are some open issues: on Tuesday March 15 from 4PM until 5.30PM